New HSE advice on CE marking assemblies of machinery
Skip to content

New HSE advice on CE marking assemblies of machinery

2012 July 16
Guarded machinery in a plant

This post was originally published on machinebuilding.net. Reprinted with permission.

By Jon Severn, machinebuilding.net

Guarded machinery in a plantA degree of confusion surrounds the question of CE marking assemblies of machinery under the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. To help clarify the situation, the HSE (Health and Safety Executive) has published a new page on its website entitledIn situ manufacture or assembly of work equipment and plant. This contains plenty of useful information for machine builders, system integrators, line builders and end users. Without wishing to repeat the contents in their entirety, the following highlights some of the more important points relating to assemblies of machinery and the addition of new machinery to existing assemblies.

What is an ‘assembly of machinery’?

As the HSE web page explains, an assembly of machines must be CE marked as a whole when individual machines are linked in order to perform a common function, when those machines are interconnected so that an individual machine (or element) affects the operation of others such that the whole needs to be risk-assessed, and when there is a common control system for the constituent units. On the other hand, if the connected machines function independently, this is not considered to be an assembly of machines for the purpose of CE marking to the Machinery Directive.

What about an entire plant?

The HSE says that a complete industrial plant comprising many individual machines, assemblies of machines and other equipment should be treated as separate sections, with any risks at the interfaces covered by installation instructions.

The responsible ‘manufacturer’

Assemblies of machines must be CE marked as a whole by the responsible ‘manufacturer’ – which might be the system integrator, line builder or end user, whether or not they have manufactured the constituent units. If the individual units are capable of operating independently then they should be CE marked and be accompanied by a Declaration of Conformity (DoC); if they are placed on the market as partly completed machinery (intended for incorporation within an assembly of machinery, for example), then they should not be CE marked but they should be accompanied by a Declaration of Incorporation (Dol) and assembly instructions.

Extent of responsibilities

According to the HSE, a ‘manufacturer’ who is creating an assembly of machines is not responsible for the design of the individual machines and partly completed machines, provided the ‘manufacturer’ has checked that the equipment came with a DoC or Dol and adequate instructions (covering installation, operation, maintenance, etc), is CE marked where appropriate, and is free from ‘obvious’ defects (the HSE gives the example of damaged or missing guards).

Adding new machinery to old assemblies

So far we have considered only new assemblies of machinery, but the HSE web page for In Situ Manufacture also addresses the question of assemblies comprising new and existing machinery – as might be the case when a line is being modified, upgraded or extended. Whether or not the whole assembly needs to be reassessed under the Machinery Directive will depend on ta number of factors, so the HSE directs readers to the European Commission’s official Guide to the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC. However, the HSE’s new web page does state ‘where a new machine is added to an assembly you do not have to re-asses those other machines in the assembly which are not affected in any way.’ Having said that, bear in mind that employers have certain duties under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER), which may have implications for older machinery whether or not it is being modified.

More information is available on the HSE website, in the EC’s official Guide to the Machinery Directive, and in various machinery safety guides and White Papers published by Procter Machine Guarding.

Thanks to Jonathan Severn at machinebuilding.net!

Post By Doug Nix (100 Posts)

+DougNix is Managing Director and Principal Consultant at Compliance InSight Consulting, Inc. (http://www.complianceinsight.ca) in Kitchener, Ontario, and is Lead Author and Managing Editor of the Machinery Safety 101 blog.

Doug's work includes teaching machinery risk assessment techniques privately and through Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning in Kitchener, Ontario, as well as providing technical services and training programs to clients related to risk assessment, industrial machinery safety, safety-related control system integration and reliability, laser safety and regulatory conformity.

Website: → Compliance inSight Consulting Inc.

Connect

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2012
Acknowledgements: machinebuiling.net - Used with permission.
Some Rights Reserved
No comments yet

Comments are closed.

All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove
Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE
%d bloggers like this: