Do you use ISO 13849 or IEC 62061? We need to hear from you! UPDATED

Do you use ISO 13849 – 1 or IEC 62061 to define and ana­lyze the safety related parts of the con­trol sys­tems used on your machinery? Have you been frus­trated by try­ing to apply these stand­ards? Good news! ISO and IEC are work­ing on mer­ging these doc­u­ments, but the com­mit­tee work­ing on the mer­ger needs some guid­ance from users. Here’s your chance to be heard!

Be Heard

Survey graphicIn May this year, ISO TC199 launched an online sur­vey ask­ing for input from machine build­ers and any­one else that uses ISO 13849 or IEC 62061. The sur­vey probes ways that the stand­ards are used , the kinds of prob­lems they encounter when try­ing to apply them, and how the use of these stand­ards affects their products and busi­nesses. The sur­vey, titled “Design of safety related controls/​control sys­tems for machinery – Experiences with gen­er­ic stand­ards (in par­tic­u­lar ISO 13849 – 1 and IEC 62061)” asks a num­ber of import­ant ques­tions that will guide the Joint Working Group 1 (JWG1) as work pro­ceeds on mer­ging ISO 13849 and IEC 62061.

The sur­vey cov­ers:

  • The gen­er­ic and machine-​specific stand­ards used in your com­pany;
  • The types of con­trol tech­no­lo­gies used in your products;
  • Challenges with get­ting com­pon­ent reli­ab­il­ity data;
  • Use of ‘well-​tried com­pon­ents’, and the meth­ods to qual­i­fy­ing com­pon­ents as ‘well-​tried’;
  • Challenges related to integ­rat­ing mech­an­ic­al, pneu­mat­ic or hydraul­ic com­pon­ents in the design of the safety related con­trols, and the spe­cif­ic chal­lenges you have with this, as well as the means you have developed to over­come these chal­lenges;
  • The sources you use for fail­ure rate data;
  • The influ­ence of accident/​incident his­tory on your designs;
  • Methods used to determ­ine PLs or SILs;
  • The use of des­ig­nated archi­tec­tures in your designs;
  • The use of dia­gnostics;
  • Verification and val­id­a­tion pro­ced­ures;
  • Use of Common Cause factors; and
  • The use of design soft­ware tools like SISTEMA, PasCAL or SET

As you can see, it’s pretty wide-​ranging. If you have a few minutes and would like to con­trib­ute to the future devel­op­ment of these stand­ards, the Joint Working Group would like to hear from you! 

The sur­vey closes 31-​Aug-​12 30-​Nov-​12. Take a minute now to com­plete it.

English Survey

French Survey

German Survey

Author: Doug Nix

+DougNix is Managing Director and Principal Consultant at Compliance InSight Consulting, Inc. (http://www.complianceinsight.ca) in Kitchener, Ontario, and is Lead Author and Managing Editor of the Machinery Safety 101 blog.

Doug's work includes teaching machinery risk assessment techniques privately and through Conestoga College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning in Kitchener, Ontario, as well as providing technical services and training programs to clients related to risk assessment, industrial machinery safety, safety-related control system integration and reliability, laser safety and regulatory conformity.

Follow me on Academia.edu//a.academia-assets.com/javascripts/social.js