<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Machinery Safety 101 &#187; Functional Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://machinerysafety101.com/category/functional-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://machinerysafety101.com</link>
	<description>Safe designs for safe workplaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.6.3" -->
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Machinery Safety 101 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</webMaster>
	<category>posts</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Expert Advice, Safety Reviews and In-Depth Training from Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>dnix@complianceinsight.ca</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://machinerysafety101.com/MS101_144x144.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>IEC/TR 62061-1 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEC 62061]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why You Need to Spend More Cash on Yet Another Document Standards organizations publish documents in a fairly continuous stream, so for those of us tasked with staying current with a large number of standards (say, more than 10), the publication of another new standard or Technical Report isn&#8217;t news &#8211; it&#8217;s business as usual. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[IEC/TR 62061-1]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five things most machine builders do incorrectly</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five things that most machine builders fail to do. With a Sixth Bonus failure!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety is Good Business</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this excellent article from Rockwell Automation's <em>The Journal</em>, Mike Miller and Wayne Solberg explain how EN ISO 13849-1 and EN IEC 62061 mesh for machine builders. 
 
Well worth the read in my opinion! 
 
<a href="http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/ar/5058e-ar102_-en-e.pdf" target="_blank">The Journal: Safety is Good Business - Marshall &#038; Solberg</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 2: Category 1</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article expands on the first in the series "Interlock Architectures – Pt. 1: What do those categories really mean?". Learn about the basic circuit architectures that underlie all safety interlock systems under ISO 13849-1, and CSA Z432 and ANSI RIA R15.06.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures &#8211; Pt. 1: What do those categories really mean?</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/21/interlock-architectures-pt-1-what-do-those-categories-really-mean/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/21/interlock-architectures-pt-1-what-do-those-categories-really-mean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1995 CEN published an important standard for machine builders - EN 954-1, <em>Safety of Machinery - Safety Related Parts of Control Systems - Part 1: General Principles for Design.</em> This standard set the stage for defining control reliability in machinery safeguarding systems, introducing the Reliability categories that have become ubiquitous. So what do these categories mean, and how are they applied under the latest machinery standard, ISO 13849-1?</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/21/interlock-architectures-pt-1-what-do-those-categories-really-mean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EN ISO 13849-1 Mandatory Implementation Date CONFIRMED!</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/29/en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date-confirmed/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/29/en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date-confirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Commission confirms the mandatory implementation date for EN ISO 13849-1:2008 in the Official Journal of the European Commission.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/29/en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date-confirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on EN ISO 13849-1 Mandatory Implementation Date</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/21/no-new-updates-on-en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/21/no-new-updates-on-en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/21/no-new-updates-on-en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The machinery world continues to wait for the European Commission to reveal the new Mandatory Implementation Date for EN ISO 13849-1.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/21/no-new-updates-on-en-iso-13849-1-mandatory-implementation-date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EN 954-1 / ISO 13849-1:2008 Mandatory Implementation Date Change</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/09/en-954-1-iso-13849-12008-mandatory-implementation-date-change/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/09/en-954-1-iso-13849-12008-mandatory-implementation-date-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EC Machinery Working Group announces the extension of the mandatory implementation date for EN ISO 13849-1:2008.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/12/09/en-954-1-iso-13849-12008-mandatory-implementation-date-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More flip-flopping on EN 954-1?</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/10/21/more-flip-flopping-on-en-954-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/10/21/more-flip-flopping-on-en-954-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent posts I've been discussing the changes in the use of EN 954-1, <em>Safety of Machinery – Safety Related Parts of Control Systems. Part 1: General Principles for Design</em>. The EU originally announced that this standard was to be withdrawn on 31-Dec-09, being replaced by EN ISO 13849-1. As you may know, there are significant differences in these two standards. 
 
A later announcement from the European Commission repealed]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/10/21/more-flip-flopping-on-en-954-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU changes direction on EN ISO 13849-1</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on EN ISO 13849-1 mandatory implementation date.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
