<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Machinery Safety 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://machinerysafety101.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://machinerysafety101.com</link>
	<description>Safe designs for safe workplaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.6.3" -->
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Machinery Safety 101 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</webMaster>
	<category>posts</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Expert Advice, Safety Reviews and In-Depth Training from Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>dnix@complianceinsight.ca</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://machinerysafety101.com/MS101_144x144.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>IEC/TR 62061-1 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEC 62061]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why You Need to Spend More Cash on Yet Another Document Standards organizations publish documents in a fairly continuous stream, so for those of us tasked with staying current with a large number of standards (say, more than 10), the publication of another new standard or Technical Report isn&#8217;t news &#8211; it&#8217;s business as usual. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[IEC/TR 62061-1]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Busting Emergency Stop Myths</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/busting-emergency-stop-myths/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/busting-emergency-stop-myths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13850]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a number of myths that have grown up around emergency stops over the years. These myths can lead to injury or death, so it's time for a little Myth Busting here on the MS101 blog!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/busting-emergency-stop-myths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guarding Emergency Stop Devices</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/guarding-emergency-stop-devices/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/guarding-emergency-stop-devices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can emergency stop devices that a prone to unintended operation be guarded? Find out!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/03/guarding-emergency-stop-devices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Inconceivable” Consequences of Failure</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/31/the-%e2%80%9cinconceivable%e2%80%9d-consequences-of-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/31/the-%e2%80%9cinconceivable%e2%80%9d-consequences-of-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Assessment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine pointed me to this interesting article by Donald Christiansen that was published in the August edition of IEEE USA's Today's Engineer magazine. 
 As engineers designing equipment, we normally conduct some form of risk assessment. Although many companies are still using informal and undocumented methods, methodical, documented risk assessments are becoming the norm in industry.</p> 
 
<p>Since understanding the risk related to our designs is fundamental</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/31/the-%e2%80%9cinconceivable%e2%80%9d-consequences-of-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 3: Category 2</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article explores the requirements for safety related control systems meeting ISO 13849-1 Category 2 requirements. "Gotcha!" points in the definition are highlighted to help designers avoid this common pitfalls.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BSI Publishes New Guide to Machinery Safety</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/12/bsi-publishes-new-guide-to-machinery-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/12/bsi-publishes-new-guide-to-machinery-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUWER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BSI publishes a new guide on the application of 2006/42/EC and the PUWER regs. If you are UK based or export to the UK market you need this guide.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/12/bsi-publishes-new-guide-to-machinery-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hazard Identification &#8211; Engineered Nanoparticles</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/10/hazard-identification-engineered-nanoparticles/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/10/hazard-identification-engineered-nanoparticles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understanding the hazards presented by processes is critical to protecting workers. Nanoparticles are entering the workplace in new products and processes, but the hazards are not well understood. Read this article to learn more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/10/hazard-identification-engineered-nanoparticles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five things most machine builders do incorrectly</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five things that most machine builders fail to do. With a Sixth Bonus failure!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/five-things-most-machine-builders-do-incorrectly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Guide to Applying ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IEC and ISO have published a new guide to help users select between ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061. This new Technical Report will replace Table 1 in both standards.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[IEC/TR 62061-1]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety is Good Business</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this excellent article from Rockwell Automation's <em>The Journal</em>, Mike Miller and Wayne Solberg explain how EN ISO 13849-1 and EN IEC 62061 mesh for machine builders. 
 
Well worth the read in my opinion! 
 
<a href="http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/ar/5058e-ar102_-en-e.pdf" target="_blank">The Journal: Safety is Good Business - Marshall &#038; Solberg</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
