<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Machinery Safety 101 &#187; CSA Z432</title>
	<atom:link href="http://machinerysafety101.com/tag/csa-z432/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://machinerysafety101.com</link>
	<description>Safe designs for safe workplaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>The Third Level of the Hierarchy: Information for Use</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2012/01/16/the-third-level-of-the-hierarchy-information-for-use/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2012/01/16/the-third-level-of-the-hierarchy-information-for-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information for Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006/42/EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hierarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2012/01/16/the-third-level-of-the-hierarchy-information-for-use/" title="The Third Level of the Hierarchy: Information for Use"></a>I’ve written about the Hierarchy of Controls in past posts, but I’ve focused on the ‘engineering’ side of the control equation: Physical changes to machine design to eliminate hazards, and mechanical or electrical control systems that can reduce risk. The &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2012/01/16/the-third-level-of-the-hierarchy-information-for-use/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2012/01/16/the-third-level-of-the-hierarchy-information-for-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Hierarchy of Controls]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures Pt. 6 — Comparing North American and International Systems</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/10/03/interlock-architectures-pt-6-comparing-north-american-and-international-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/10/03/interlock-architectures-pt-6-comparing-north-american-and-international-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=1368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/10/03/interlock-architectures-pt-6-comparing-north-american-and-international-systems/" title="Interlock Architectures Pt. 6 - Comparing North American and International Systems"><img width="620" height="200" src="http://machinerysafety101.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Industrial-Control-Console-620x200.jpg" class="attachment-extra-featured-image wp-post-image" alt="industrial Control Console" title="Industrial Control Console" /></a>I’ve now written six posts, including this one, on the topic of circuit architectures for the safety–related parts of control systems. In this post, we’ll compare the International and North American systems. This comparison is not intended to draw conclusions &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/10/03/interlock-architectures-pt-6-comparing-north-american-and-international-systems/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/10/03/interlock-architectures-pt-6-comparing-north-american-and-international-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 5: Category 4 — Control Reliable</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/" title="Interlock Architectures – Pt. 5: Category 4 — Control Reliable"></a>The most reliable of the five system architectures, Category 4 is the only architecture that uses multiple-fault tolerant techniques to help ensure that component failures do not result in an unacceptable exposure to risk. This post will delve into the &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 4: Category 3 — Control Reliable</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/19/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-4-category-3-control-reliable/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/19/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-4-category-3-control-reliable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/19/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-4-category-3-control-reliable/" title="Interlock Architectures – Pt. 4: Category 3 - Control Reliable"><img width="620" height="200" src="http://machinerysafety101.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Figure-11-Cat-3-Block-620x200.jpg" class="attachment-extra-featured-image wp-post-image" alt="ISO 13849-1 Figure 11" title="Figure 11 Cat 3 Block" /></a>Category 3 system architecture is the first category that could be considered to have similarity to “Control Reliable” circuits or systems as defined in the North American standards. It is not the same as Control Reliable, but we’ll get to &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/19/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-4-category-3-control-reliable/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/19/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-4-category-3-control-reliable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Risk Assessment</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/01/31/understanding-risk-assessment/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/01/31/understanding-risk-assessment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEC 62061]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/01/31/understanding-risk-assessment/" title="Understanding Risk Assessment"></a>When people discuss ‘Risk’ there are a lot of different assumptions made about what that means. For me, the study of risk and risk assessment techniques started in 1995. As a technologist and controls designer, I had to somehow wrap &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/01/31/understanding-risk-assessment/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/01/31/understanding-risk-assessment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emergency Stop Categories</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/27/emergency-stop-categories/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/27/emergency-stop-categories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA z434]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 60204-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEC 60204-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFPA 79]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop category]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/27/emergency-stop-categories/" title="Emergency Stop Categories"><img width="620" height="200" src="http://machinerysafety101.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Estop-closeup-620x200.jpg" class="attachment-extra-featured-image wp-post-image" alt="Emergency Stop on machine console" title="Emergency Stop on machine console" /></a>I’ve noticed a lot of people looking for information on Emergency Stop categories recently, so this post is aimed at those readers who want to understand this topic in more depth. Categories The first point to make is that these &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/27/emergency-stop-categories/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/27/emergency-stop-categories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 3: Category 2</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article explores the requirements for safety related control systems meeting ISO 13849-1 Category 2 requirements. "Gotcha!" points in the definition are highlighted to help designers avoid this common pitfalls.<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 2: Category 1</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hierarchy of Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article expands on the first in the series "Interlock Architectures – Pt. 1: What do those categories really mean?". Learn about the basic circuit architectures that underlie all safety interlock systems under ISO 13849-1, and CSA Z432 and ANSI RIA R15.06.<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlocked gate testing</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/17/interlocked-gate-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/17/interlocked-gate-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stopping performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stopping time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that interlocked gates require stopping performance testing? 
 
Machinery needs to be able to stop in the time it takes a person to open the guard and reach the hazard. If the distance from the guard opening to the hazard is short enough that a person can reach the danger point before the hazard can be controlled, the guard is useless. The resulting situation may be worse<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/17/interlocked-gate-testing/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/17/interlocked-gate-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emergency Stop — What’s so confusing about that?</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/03/06/emergency-stop-whats-so-confusing-about-that/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/03/06/emergency-stop-whats-so-confusing-about-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complementary Protective Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North American Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13850]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get a lot of calls and emails asking about emergency stops. This is one of those deceptively simple concepts that has managed to get very complicated over time. Not every machine needs or can benefit from an emergency stop. In some cases, it may lead to an unreasonable expectation of safety from the user, which can lead to injury if they don't understand the hazards involved. Some product-specific standards<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/03/06/emergency-stop-whats-so-confusing-about-that/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/03/06/emergency-stop-whats-so-confusing-about-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></series:name>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: machinerysafety101.com @ 2012-02-05 00:34:26 by W3 Total Cache -->
