<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Machinery Safety 101 &#187; EMC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://machinerysafety101.com/tag/emc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://machinerysafety101.com</link>
	<description>Safe designs for safe workplaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 01:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 5: Category 4 — Control Reliable</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/" title="Interlock Architectures – Pt. 5: Category 4 — Control Reliable"></a>The most reliable of the five system architectures, Category 4 is the only architecture that uses multiple-fault tolerant techniques to help ensure that component failures do not result in an unacceptable exposure to risk. This post will delve into the &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2011/09/26/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-5-category-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[Circuit Architectures Explored]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AntennaSys tests the iPhone 4…</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/22/antennasys-tests-the-iphone-4/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/22/antennasys-tests-the-iphone-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you an Apple fan? An iPhone fan? Here's an <a href="http://www.antennasys.com/antennasys-blog/2010/7/14/iphone-4-meets-the-gripofdeathinator.html" target="_blank">article on an independent test</a> on the iPhone 4 by AntennaSys that may interest you... 
 
http://www.AntennaSys.com 
 
You may also be interested in this <a href="http://spectrum.ieee.org/podcast/telecom/wireless/how-bad-is-the-iphone-4s-antenna-problem" target="_blank">IEEE podcast</a> with one of the principles at AntennaSys, Spencer Webb<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/22/antennasys-tests-the-iphone-4/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/22/antennasys-tests-the-iphone-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside Apple’s EMC Lab</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/19/inside-apples-emc-lab/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/19/inside-apples-emc-lab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macworld was invited <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/152771/2010/07/wireless_lab.html?lsrc=nl_mwweek_h_cbstories" target="_blank">inside Apple's EMC test lab</a> for a tour - the first time journalists have been permitted into this area. This article looks at what Apple does to make sure their products meet EMC design requirements. Testing industrial equipment is often simpler that this, and you don't need to buy your own labs to do it. Are your machine designs compliant? Would you know if they<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/19/inside-apples-emc-lab/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/19/inside-apples-emc-lab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for Functional Safety</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the recent PSES Symposium, I attended a couple of interesting workshops on EMC and Functional Safety. One was called "Workshop on EMC &#038; Functional Safety" presented by Keith Armstrong, Bill Radasky and Jacques Delaballe. The other was a paper presentation called "Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for Functional Safety" presented by Keith Armstrong. 
 
For readers who are new to the idea of Functional Safety, this field deals<p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 IEEE PSES Symposium On Product Compliance Engineering</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CIC Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE PSES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June Andersen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great Symposium! Dr. June Andersen kicked it off with a great keynote, and the rest of the sessions were excellent! <p class="read-more"><a href="http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: machinerysafety101.com @ 2012-05-22 00:57:33 by W3 Total Cache -->
