<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Machinery Safety 101 &#187; Functional Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://machinerysafety101.com/tag/functional-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://machinerysafety101.com</link>
	<description>Safe designs for safe workplaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" - maintenance_release="8.8.6.3" -->
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Machinery Safety 101 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>dnix@complianceinsight.ca (Machinery Safety 101)</webMaster>
	<category>posts</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Expert Advice, Safety Reviews and In-Depth Training from Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Machinery Safety 101</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>dnix@complianceinsight.ca</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://machinerysafety101.com/MS101_144x144.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>IEC/TR 62061-1 Reviewed</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEC 62061]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why You Need to Spend More Cash on Yet Another Document Standards organizations publish documents in a fairly continuous stream, so for those of us tasked with staying current with a large number of standards (say, more than 10), the publication of another new standard or Technical Report isn&#8217;t news &#8211; it&#8217;s business as usual. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/09/08/iectr-62061-1-reviewed-or-why-you-need-to-spend-some-cash-on-yet-another-document/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[IEC/TR 62061-1]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 3: Category 2</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guards and Guarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article explores the requirements for safety related control systems meeting ISO 13849-1 Category 2 requirements. "Gotcha!" points in the definition are highlighted to help designers avoid this common pitfalls.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/24/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-3-category-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Guide to Applying ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IEC and ISO have published a new guide to help users select between ISO 13849-1 and IEC 62061. This new Technical Report will replace Table 1 in both standards.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/08/06/new-guide-to-applying-iso-13849-1-and-iec-62061/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[IEC/TR 62061-1]]></series:name>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety is Good Business</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this excellent article from Rockwell Automation's <em>The Journal</em>, Mike Miller and Wayne Solberg explain how EN ISO 13849-1 and EN IEC 62061 mesh for machine builders. 
 
Well worth the read in my opinion! 
 
<a href="http://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/ar/5058e-ar102_-en-e.pdf" target="_blank">The Journal: Safety is Good Business - Marshall &#038; Solberg</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/safety-is-good-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interlock Architectures – Pt. 2: Category 1</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interlocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls reliability 13849 machinery  interlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSA Z432]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article expands on the first in the series "Interlock Architectures – Pt. 1: What do those categories really mean?". Learn about the basic circuit architectures that underlie all safety interlock systems under ISO 13849-1, and CSA Z432 and ANSI RIA R15.06.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2010/07/28/interlock-architectures-%e2%80%93-pt-2-category-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU changes direction on EN ISO 13849-1</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CE Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN 954-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EN ISO 13849-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 13849-1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on EN ISO 13849-1 mandatory implementation date.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2009/09/27/eu-changes-direction-on-en-iso-13849-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for Functional Safety</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the recent PSES Symposium, I attended a couple of interesting workshops on EMC and Functional Safety. One was called "Workshop on EMC &#038; Functional Safety" presented by Keith Armstrong, Bill Radasky and Jacques Delaballe. The other was a paper presentation called "Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for Functional Safety" presented by Keith Armstrong. 
 
For readers who are new to the idea of Functional Safety, this field deals]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/11/17/why-conventional-emc-testing-is-insufficient-for-functional-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 IEEE PSES Symposium On Product Compliance Engineering</title>
		<link>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IEEE PSES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June Andersen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://machinerysafety101.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a great Symposium! Dr. June Andersen kicked it off with a great keynote, and the rest of the sessions were excellent! ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://machinerysafety101.com/2008/10/27/2008-ieee-pses-symposium-on-product-compliance-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
