Five reasons you should attend our Free Safety Talks

A dark-blue banner with the Franklin Empire and Schmersal logos in white.

Reason #1 – Free Safety Talks

You can’t argue with Free Stuff! Last week we partnered with Schmersal Canada and Franklin Empire to put on three days of Free Safety Talks. We had full houses in all three locations, Windsor, London and Cambridge, with nearly 60 people participating.

We had two great presenters who helped people understand Pre-Start Health and Safety Reviews (PSRs) [1], CSA Z432-2016 [2], Interlocking Devices [3] and Fault Masking [4].

Mr Vashi at Franklin Empire Cambridge
Mr. Vashi at Franklin Empire Cambridge

Franklin Empire provided great facilities and breakfast to keep our minds working. Thanks to Franklin Empire and Ben Reid, who organized all the registrations!

Mr Nix discussing injury rates in machine modes of operation
Mr. Nix discussing injury rates in machine modes of operation

Reason #2 – Understanding Interlocking Devices

A portrait of Mr Kartik Vashi
Mr. Kartik Vashi, CFSE

Mr. Kartik Vashi, CFSE, discussed the ISO Interlocking Device standard, ISO 14119. This standard guides the reader in the selection and application of interlocking devices, including the four types of interlocking devices and the various coding options for each type. Did you know that ISO 14119 is also directly referenced in CSA Z432-16 [2]? That means this standard applies to machinery built and used in Canada as of 2016. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you can contact Mr. Vashi to get more information.

ISO 14119 Fig 2 showing some aspects of different types of interlocking devices.
ISO 14119 Fig 2 shows some aspects of different types of interlocking devices [3]

Reason #3 – Understanding Fault Masking

Mr. Vashi also talked about fault-masking, an important and often misunderstood situation that can occur when interlocking devices or other electromechanical devices, like emergency stop buttons, are daisy-chained into a single safety relay or safety input on a safety PLC. Mr. Vashi drew from ISO/TR 24119 to help explain this phenomenon. If you don’t understand the impact that daisy-chaining interlocking devices can have on the reliability of your interlocking systems, Mr. Vashi can help you get a handle on this topic.

A part of ISO 24119 Fig 2 showing one method of daisy-chaining interlocking devices.
A part of ISO 24119 Fig 2 shows one common method of daisy-chaining interlocking devices [4]

Reason # 4 – Pre-Start Health and Safety Reviews

Portrait of Doug Nix, C.E.T.
Mr. Doug Nix, C.E.T.

Mr. Nix opened his presentation by discussing commonly asked questions about Pre-Start Health and Safety Reviews (PSRs). There are many ways that people become confused about the WHY, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHO and HOW of PSRs and Mr. Nix covered them all. This unique-to-Ontario process requires an employer to have machines, equipment, racking and processes reviewed by a Professional Engineer or another Qualified Person when certain circumstances exist (see O. Reg. 851, Section 7 Table). If you are confused by the PSR requirements, contact Mr. Nix for help with your questions.

Reason #5 – Understanding the changes to CSA Z432

CSA Z432 [2] was updated in 2016 with many changes. This much-needed update came after 12 years of experience with the 2004 edition and many changes in machinery safety technology. Mr. Nix briefly explored the changes to Canadian machine builders in the new edition, including the many new references to ISO and IEC standards. These new references will help European machine builders get their products accepted in Canadian markets. Mr. Vashi and Mr. Nix sit on the CSA Technical Committee responsible for CSA Z432.

Reason #6 – Hot Questions

We like to over-deliver, so here’s the bonus reason!

We had some great questions posed by our attendees, two of which we are answering in video posts this week. If you have ever considered using a programmable safety system for lockout, our first video explains why this is not yet a possibility. Mr. Nix gets into some of the reliability considerations behind the O.Reg. 851 Sections 75 and 76 and CSA Z460 requirements.

Mr. Nix posted a second video discussing ISO 13849-1 [5] Category 2 architecture requirements, particularly the testing Intervals required by the standard. This video explains why it is impossible to meet the testing requirements using a purely electromechanical design solution.

Edit: 16-May-18

A case in the UK illustrates the dangers of bypassing interlocking systems. A worker was killed by a conveyor system in a pre-cast concrete plant while working in an area normally protected by a key-exchange system. Here’s the link to the article on Allowing workers into the danger zone of a machine without other effective risk reduction measures may be a death sentence.


[1] “Industrial Establishments, RRO 1990, Reg 851”, Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII), 2022. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 24-Aug-2022].

[2] Safeguarding of machinery, CSA Z432-16 (R2021). CSA Group, 2016. [Online]. Available: [Accessed: 24-Aug-2022].

[3] Safety of machinery — Interlocking devices associated with guards — Principles for design and selection, ISO 14119. 2013.

[4] Safety of machinery — Evaluation of fault masking serial connection of interlocking devices associated with guards with potential free contacts, ISO/TR 24119. 2015.

[5] Control of hazardous energy — Lockout and other methods, CSA Z460. 2013.

[6] Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems — Part 1: General principles for design, ISO 13849-1. 2015.

© 2018 – 2022, Compliance inSight Consulting Inc. Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.