Machinery Safety 101
15 May, 2018

Q & A: Can Safety PLCs be used for Lockout?

by Doug Nix
in Functional Safety, Hazardous Energy Control Procedures, ISO 13849, Lockout, Ontario, Q & A /
3 Comments
This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series Q&A
wp-content/uploads/2018/07/iStock_000017226942Small-431x480.jpg
Q&A

The ques­tion of lock­out and the use of safety PLCs as a means to meet the lock­out require­ments comes up more and more fre­quently these days. Can Safety PLCs be used for lock­out? Safety pro­fes­sion­als don’t always agree on this con­tro­ver­sial top­ic!

Dur­ing the Free Safety Talks that we did with Schmersal Canada and Frank­lin Empire, this hot ques­tion came up, so I thought I’d cov­er it off in a video. If you need some spe­cif­ic help with an applic­a­tion like this, please get in touch with Doug dir­ectly.

There is a lot to say, and in this video I try to cov­er off the reas­ons why Safety PLCs and Lock­out don’t always mix well.

Notes

Ontario Reg­u­la­tion 851, Indus­tri­al Estab­lish­ments

CSA Z432, Safe­guard­ing of Machinery

CSA Z460, Con­trol of haz­ard­ous energy – Lock­out and oth­er meth­ods

ISO 13849 – 1, Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of con­trol sys­tems — Part 1: Gen­er­al prin­ciples for design

ISO 13849 – 2, Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of con­trol sys­tems — Part 2: Val­id­a­tion

IEC 62061, Safety of machinery – Func­tion­al safety of safety-related elec­tric­al, elec­tron­ic and pro­gram­mable elec­tron­ic con­trol sys­tems

IEC TR 62061 – 1:2010, Guid­ance on the applic­a­tion of ISO 13849 – 1 and IEC 62061 in the design of safety-related con­trol sys­tems for machinery

Ques­tions? Leave a com­ment below or email Doug.

Series Nav­ig­a­tion& A: Cat­egory 2 and Test­ing Intervals”>Q & A: Cat­egory 2 and Test­ing Inter­vals

3 thoughts on “Q & A: Can Safety PLCs be used for Lockout?”

  1. Thanks Doug. Between talk­ing with you last week and watch­ing this video, I’ve learned a lot. Lol… Lost me on the math part, but, I under­stood the gen­er­al concept of what you were try­ing to say. A very well done top­ic. Thank you!

    Reply

    1. Hey Frank,

      Don’t worry – the cal­cu­la­tions aren’t the heart of the story – the com­par­is­on between the reli­ab­il­ity fig­ures and the fact that CSA Z460 calls for lock­out devices to be exclus­ively mech­an­ic­al is the import­ant part. Until there is suf­fi­cient real-world data on the applic­a­tion of hybrid devices with mech­an­ic­al, elec­tron­ic and soft­ware ele­ments, we are not going to have enough inform­a­tion to know if these sys­tems can be used in high-risk applic­a­tions. Until then, a high level of mech­an­ic­al reli­ab­il­ity is required.

      Glad you found the video help­ful. Let me know if you have any oth­er ques­tions!

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Five reasons you should attend our Free Safety Talks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove