Control Functions

How to do a 13849 – 1 analysis: Complete Reference List

Posted on
This entry is part 8 of 9 in the series How to do a 13849 – 1 ana­lys­is

As prom­ised in pre­vi­ous posts, here is the com­plete ref­er­ence list for the series “How to do a 13849 – 1 ana­lys­is”! If you have any addi­tion­al resources you think read­ers would find help­ful, please add them in the com­ments. Book List Here are some books that I think you may find help­ful on this jour­ney: [0]     […]

Canada

ISO 13849 – 1 Analysis — Part 8: Fault Exclusion

Posted on
This entry is part 9 of 9 in the series How to do a 13849 – 1 ana­lys­is

Fault Con­sid­er­a­tion & Fault Exclu­sion ISO 13849 – 1, Chapter 7 [1, 7] dis­cusses the need for fault con­sid­er­a­tion and fault exclu­sion. Fault con­sid­er­a­tion is the pro­cess of examin­ing the com­pon­ents and sub-sys­tems used in the safety-related part of the con­trol sys­tem (SRP/CS) and mak­ing a list of all the faults that could occur in each one. This a def­in­itely non-trivi­al […]

Canada

ISO 13849 – 1 Analysis — Part 6: CCF — Common Cause Failures

Posted on
This entry is part 6 of 9 in the series How to do a 13849 – 1 ana­lys­is

What is a Com­mon Cause Fail­ure? There are two sim­il­ar-sound­ing terms that people often get con­fused: Com­mon Cause Fail­ure (CCF) and Com­mon Mode Fail­ure. While these two types of fail­ures sound sim­il­ar, they are dif­fer­ent. A Com­mon Cause Fail­ure is a fail­ure in a sys­tem where two or more por­tions of the sys­tem fail at the same time from a single […]

Control Functions

31-Dec-2011 – Are YOU ready?

Posted on
This entry is part 8 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

31-Decem­ber-2011 marks a key mile­stone for machine build­ers mar­ket­ing their products in the European Uni­on, the EEA and many of the Can­did­ate States. Func­tion­al Safety takes a pos­it­ive step for­ward with the man­dat­ory applic­a­tion of EN ISO 13849 – 1 and ‑2. As of 1‑Janu­ary-2012, the safety-related parts of the con­trol sys­tems on all machinery bear­ing a CE Mark will be […]

Control Functions

Interlock Architectures Pt. 6 – Comparing North American and International Systems

Posted on
industrial Control Console
This entry is part 6 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

I’ve now writ­ten six posts, includ­ing this one, on the top­ic of cir­cuit archi­tec­tures for the safety-related parts of con­trol sys­tems. In this post, we’ll com­pare the Inter­na­tion­al and North Amer­ic­an sys­tems. This com­par­is­on is not inten­ded to draw con­clu­sions about which is “bet­ter”, but rather to com­pare and con­trast the two sys­tems so that […]

Control Functions

Interlock Architectures – Pt. 5: Category 4 — Control Reliable

Posted on
This entry is part 5 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

Ed. note: I’ve made a few updates to this art­icle since it was first pub­lished in 2011, with the most recent today, 6‑Dec-18. – DN – The most reli­able of the five sys­tem archi­tec­tures, Cat­egory 4 is the only archi­tec­ture that uses mul­­tiple-fault tol­er­ant tech­niques to help ensure that com­pon­ent fail­ures do not res­ult in an unac­cept­able […]

Control Functions

Interlock Architectures – Pt. 4: Category 3 – Control Reliable

Posted on
Category 3 Architecture Logic Block Diagram
This entry is part 4 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

Cat­egory 3 sys­tem archi­tec­ture is the first cat­egory that could be con­sidered to have sim­il­ar­ity to “Con­trol Reli­able” cir­cuits or sys­tems as defined in the North Amer­ic­an stand­ards. It is not the same as Con­trol Reli­able, but we’ll get to in a sub­sequent post. If you haven’t read the first three posts in this series, you may […]

Canada

Understanding Risk Assessment

Posted on
A group surrounding a computer discussing a problem.
This entry is part 10 of 9 in the series Risk Assess­ment

When people dis­cuss ‘Risk’ there are a lot of dif­fer­ent assump­tions made about what that means. For me, the study of risk and risk assess­ment tech­niques star­ted in 1995. As a tech­no­lo­gist and con­trols design­er, I had to some­how wrap my head around the whole concept in ways I’d nev­er con­sidered. If you’re try­ing to fig­ure out risk […]

CE Mark

IEC/TR 62061 – 1 Reviewed

Posted on
This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series IEC/TR 62061 – 1

Why You Need to Spend More Cash on Yet Anoth­er Doc­u­ment Stand­ards organ­iz­a­tions pub­lish doc­u­ments in a fairly con­tinu­ous stream, so for those of us tasked with stay­ing cur­rent with a large num­ber of stand­ards (say, more than 10), the pub­lic­a­tion of anoth­er new stand­ard or Tech­nic­al Report isn’t news – it’s busi­ness as usu­al. The ques­tion […]