Machinery Safety 101

IEC/TR 62061 – 1 Reviewed

This entry is part 2 of 2 in the series IEC/TR 62061 – 1

Why You Need to Spend More Cash on Yet Anoth­er Doc­u­ment Stand­ards organ­iz­a­tions pub­lish doc­u­ments in a fairly con­tinu­ous stream, so for those of us tasked with stay­ing cur­rent with a large num­ber of stand­ards (say, more than 10), the pub­lic­a­tion of anoth­er new stand­ard or Tech­nic­al Report isn’t news – it’s busi­ness as usu­al. The ques­tion…

Read More

Interlock Architectures – Pt. 3: Category 2

ISO 13849-1 Figure 10
This entry is part 3 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

This art­icle explores the require­ments for safety related con­trol sys­tems meet­ing ISO 13849 – 1 Cat­egory 2 require­ments. “Gotcha!” points in the defin­i­tion are high­lighted to help design­ers avoid this com­mon pit­falls.

Read More

New Guide to Applying ISO 13849 – 1 and IEC 62061

This entry is part 1 of 2 in the series IEC/TR 62061 – 1

IEC and ISO have pub­lished a new guide to help users select between ISO 13849 – 1 and IEC 62061. This new Tech­nic­al Report will replace Table 1 in both stand­ards.

Read More

Safety is Good Business

In this excel­lent art­icle from Rock­well Auto­ma­tion’s The Journ­al, Mike Miller and Wayne Sol­berg explain how EN ISO 13849 – 1 and EN IEC 62061 mesh for machine build­ers.

Well worth the read in my opin­ion!

The Journ­al: Safety is Good Busi­ness – Mar­shall & Sol­berg

Interlock Architectures – Pt. 2: Category 1

This entry is part 2 of 8 in the series Cir­cuit Archi­tec­tures Explored

This art­icle expands on the first in the series “Inter­lock Archi­tec­tures – Pt. 1: What do those cat­egor­ies really mean?”. Learn about the basic cir­cuit archi­tec­tures that under­lie all safety inter­lock sys­tems under ISO 13849 – 1, and CSA Z432 and ANSI RIA R15.06.

Read More

EU changes direction on EN ISO 13849 – 1

Update on EN ISO 13849 – 1 man­dat­ory imple­ment­a­tion date.

Read More

Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for Functional Safety

At the recent PSES Sym­posi­um, I atten­ded a couple of inter­est­ing work­shops on EMC and Func­tion­al Safety. One was called “Work­shop on EMC & Func­tion­al Safety” presen­ted by Keith Arm­strong, Bill Radasky and Jacques Delaballe. The oth­er was a paper present­a­tion called “Why Con­ven­tion­al EMC Test­ing is Insuf­fi­cient for Func­tion­al Safety” presen­ted by Keith Arm­strong.

For read­ers who are new to the idea of Func­tion­al Safety, this field deals

Read More

2008 IEEE PSES Symposium On Product Compliance Engineering

What a great Sym­posi­um! Dr. June Ander­sen kicked it off with a great key­note, and the rest of the ses­sions were excel­lent!

Read More
All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove